One of the interesting benefits of reading Louis Menand's Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Metaphyisical Club: The Story of Ideas in America is understanding how important German universities were in creating America's academic institutions in post-Civil War United States. Strictly speaking, there were no graduate studies in America before the Civil War. The first graduate school was established at Johns Hopkins University and was modeled after the University of Heidelberg. Nearly every serious scholar in America made a pilgrimage to the great universities at Heidelberg, Berlin, Leipzig and Goettingen. Of Stanford University's original 30 professors, 15 had received degrees in Germany and the school's unofficial motto which appears on its official seal is Die Luft der Freiheit weht ("the wind of freedom blows") - a quote from Ulrich von Hutten, a 16th-century humanist. The founder of scientific studies at Harvard University - Louis Agassiz - was a Swiss scholar who studied at the feet of the Prussian naturalist Alexander von Humbolt. and came to America on a grant from the king of Prussia. Germany stood for quality scientific inquiry and academic freedom - virtually unknown in America up to then.
The great German academic institutions were destroyed by the Nazis, and, with some notable exceptions, never really regained their status after the war. Chronically underfunded and overcrowded, the German universities acquired a reputation of mediocrity, and many of the talented scholars and research scientists made their way to the US to study at the elite universities here.
The New York Times reports on a new German government initiative to create three new elite universities with target funding of $100 million apiece:
"With German universities — once the envy of the academic world — in decline for decades, Mr. Hommelhoff said most Germans accepted that radical measures were needed to propel them back into competition with their rivals in Britain, Switzerland and especially the United States.
To start with, Germans are abandoning a notion that all universities are basically equal — an ideal that dates from the 1970’s when university admissions were opened up and that has served to mask vast disparities in quality among the country’s 102 universities."
"Universities hope to address these shortcomings by becoming more like their elite American counterparts. Starting next year, they will be allowed to charge tuition of 500 euros, or $630, per semester. Karlsruhe has begun to practice selective admissions for its smaller humanities programs."
Karlsruhe has a long way to go before it can match the $26 billion endowment of Harvard or the lab facilities of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, but at least Germany is finally doing something to keep its most talented students in the country.
Actually, and as usual on this blog, quite the opposite is true. The new developments in the German higher education sector are quite clearly a case of decay. American "elite" unis are wholly owned business subsidiaries, ergo totalitarian institutions with zero freedom to do anything the sponsors didn't pay for. In Germany, the absence of tuition fees so far meant that a higher education depended only on the personal abilities. And I have never heard anything about the supposed mediocricity of either.
Very unfortunately, the politicians have decided to follow the Anglo model of giving only a tiny, hand-picked and rich elite the possibility of educating themselves. The masses are supposed to be dumbed down so they can be easily ruled over. Just like now over half of all Americans are functionally illiterate and incapable of rational thought, so as to make the monarchic/fascist pseudo-democracy possible.
Posted by: name | October 23, 2006 at 10:56 PM
@name,
You may want to send your interesting thoughts on the "fascist totalitarian" American universities to Prof. Noam Chomsky
c/o the Massachusetts Inst. of Technology
Posted by: David | October 24, 2006 at 08:33 AM
The main problem with the modernisation of German university system, in my opinion, is the lack of scholarships. In the US, even poor people can study at one of the elite universities, as long as they are good enough. It's kind of fair, although some rich people don't have to be that good to study at a elite university.
If you start to charge tuition fees from students in Germany, many won't be able to afford studying, because they can't get a scholarship even though they're good enough.
Posted by: littleandy | October 24, 2006 at 10:56 AM
I always thought a scholarship depended on your ability to play football. That should give the Germans quite a good chance, eh?
Posted by: name | October 24, 2006 at 11:28 AM
Littleandy,
The proposed fees are only 500 euros (plus student fees that already exist). As far as I'm aware, Barvolk (spl?) still exists, which means that a mix of grants/loans are available to German students with need. German students also have structural advantages that American students don't have, such as publically funded housing and food (Mensas). In short, higher education will remain way, way cheaper in Germany than in America for a long time to come. Finally, scholarships exist in Germany, and will surely become more common as fees rise.
I sympathize with the spirit of egalitarianism behind name's initial comments, but the policy shift leading to elite universities seems correct and necessary. If it intends to compete on an international education market, Germany needs elite universities, and it needs to charge fees to improve education and weed out unmotivated students.
Economic necessity should not always trump social justice, but in this case it has to.
Posted by: scott | October 24, 2006 at 02:39 PM
You meant to say Bafög aka Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz, lol. And I wasn't making any kind of "egalitarian" comment. The best example for successful free tuition are the scandinavian countries. Elitism however is one of many outdated and ultimately fatal illusions nurtured by the quasi-aristocracy in anglophone countries. In those countries "elite" mostly means the international level and derives from something of an inferiority complex, the well-known US-American one for example. We shouldn't need to take advice from semi-fascist countries like Australia where they will even raise your marks for cash.
Posted by: name | October 24, 2006 at 04:42 PM
and don't feel threatened by the "lol" either. With "Barvolk" you could have almost invented a new german word meaning people that don't mind paying another tax or something like that :)
Posted by: name | October 24, 2006 at 05:55 PM
"Name", what the hell are you smoking? Your ignorance of American universities is only trumped by your ability to conjure up retrograde quasi-Marxist fantasies. Following your model, Germany will be reduced to a pre-industrial society. Perhaps this is what you want. If so, I wish you lots of luck.
Posted by: Fry | October 24, 2006 at 11:44 PM
wow, "reduced to a pre-industrial society" that would make me "worse than Hitler" or some similarly demented anglo-fascist phrase :) You guys really think you're taking over the world ?
Posted by: name | October 25, 2006 at 01:23 AM
Actually, no. I think the Chinese are taking over the world. Anglo-fascism? Please. Wait to see what another twenty years of unregulated Asian capitalism combined with unreformed authoritarianism will produce. Don't worry, though. I'm sure your strategy of noncompetitive higher education will make Germany an economic superpower again.
Posted by: Fry | October 25, 2006 at 01:48 AM
scott: I agree with you, that Germany needs Universities that can compete on the international market. You need those to stop the "brain drain" from Germany to other countries. But you talk about those 500 Euros - I think, these will only the beginning, and those tuition fees will raise, especially for the elite universities. And I'm not sure wether Bafög will cover those higher fees.
After all, in the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, afaik, there are already fewer people studying since they charge the students.
Posted by: littleandy | October 25, 2006 at 01:59 AM
"I think the Chinese are taking over the world."
Yup, thats the classic Fu Manchu syndrome in Anglo-Fascism. Wasn't it the evil Mooslams,or is that yesterdays propaganda now ?
Posted by: name | October 25, 2006 at 02:19 AM
It's amusing in the extreme to be accused of propaganda by someone who uses phrases like "Anglo-fascism" and "American monarchic/fascist pseudo-democracy" with (presumably) a straight face.
But you're right, I must concede.
1) Everything bad in the world is the predictable outcome of exploitation of the innocent masses by imperialist Anglo-American running dogs.
2) Everything good in the world is the carefully crafted product of years of careful labor by a grand alliance of enlightened European socialists and happy collectivized third-world laborers.
3) If we evil Americans would just stop our constant warmongering, the world would settle into a peaceful utopia.
I feel so much better now, thank you!
Posted by: Fry | October 25, 2006 at 03:00 AM
Speaking of the "German Brain Drain", check out this post on Atlantic Review:
http://atlanticreview.org/archives/456-Brain-Drain-German-YouTube-Founder-Enjoys-the-American-Dream.html
Jawed Karim left higher ed in Germany to study at Stanford and is now worth $Millions for his participation in the YouTube start-up.
Posted by: David | October 25, 2006 at 09:42 AM
Anglo-Fascism yes, with a straight face. Neo-Nazis with clean white shirts, cold-blooded racists and totally degraded individuals from a sick system.
Here are some of your boys who are going to be worth millions, too:
http://weazlsrevenge.blogspot.com/2006/10/sign-of-whats-next-to-come-our-boys.html
Posted by: name | October 26, 2006 at 06:41 PM