« Ayn Rand, American Idol | Main | Review: Anna Seghers' DIe Entscheidung »

March 23, 2009

Comments

hattie

I find it hard to believe that Charles Murray is superior to anyone. He probably has another book to flog, you know.
There is a perennial audience in the U.S. for his kind of psuedo survival of the fittest Darwinism.
Why doesn't the WaPo run pieces by you or even me instead of by this tool?

naomi dagen bloom

Yes, why indeed would the WaPo give space--and lots of it--to Murray. Beyond me why some talk of it as "liberal" source.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad